Burkert Profile
The Burkert profile is a phenomenological cored dark-matter halo density profile introduced by Andreas Burkert in 1995 that combines a constant-density inner core with an r^(−3) outer falloff to fit the rotation curves of dwarf irregular and low-surface-brightness galaxies.
The Burkert profile (or Burkert halo model) is an empirical, spherically symmetric dark matter density law introduced by German astrophysicist Andreas Burkert in 1995 to model the H I 21-centimeter and Hα rotation curves of dark-matter-dominated dwarf irregular galaxies, dwarf spheroidal satellites, and low-surface-brightness (LSB) spiral galaxies. While dark-matter-only cosmological simulations in the standard ΛCDM paradigm predict that collisionless halos relaxing via violent relaxation develop steep inner density cusps—such as the ρ ∝ r−1 inner cusp of the Navarro–Frenk–White (NFW) and Hernquist profile models or the curved power-law slope of the Einasto profile—high-resolution kinematic observations of gas-rich dwarf galaxies consistently reveal linearly rising inner rotation curves (vc(r) ∝ r) indicative of a constant-density dark-matter core. Burkert formulated a two-parameter analytical density law that transitions smoothly from a flat central core (ρ ≈ ρ0) inside scale radius r0 to an NFW-like ρ ∝ r−3 outer decline at large galactocentric radii, establishing the empirical foundation for the core–cusp problem in galaxy formation.
Density, Enclosed Mass, and Circular Velocity Profile
A spherical Burkert dark-matter halo is parameterized by its central core density ρ0 and its core radius r0 (within which the space density drops to one-fourth of its central value, ρ(r0) = ¼ρ0):
ρ(r) = (ρ0r03) / [(r + r0)(r2 + r02)]
In terms of the dimensionless radius x = r/r0, the logarithmic density slope γ(x) = −d ln ρ / d ln x = x/(1 + x) + 2x2/(1 + x2) transitions across three radial zones:
- Inner Constant-Density Core (r ≪ r0, x ≪ 1): Near the galactic center, ρ(r) ≈ ρ0(1 − r/r0) approaches a constant ρ0 with γ(0) = 0, resembling the flat inner core of a non-singular isothermal King profile or Plummer model.
- Intermediate Isothermal Zone (r ≈ r0 to 3r0): Across intermediate radii, the factor (r2 + r02)−1 mimics a pseudo-isothermal halo (ρ ∝ r−2) with γ(1) = 3/2 and γ(1.52) = 2, producing a nearly flat rotation curve over the optical disk radius.
- Outer Cosmological Halo (r ≫ r0, x ≫ 1): At large radii compared to the core radius, ρ(r) ≈ ρ0(r0/r)3 falls off as r−3 (γ → 3), matching the outer asymptotic behavior of cosmological NFW halos rather than the r−2 divergence of a singular isothermal sphere or the r−4 falloff of the Dehnen profile family.
Integrating 4πr′2ρ(r′) from the center to radius r = xr0 via partial fractions yields the closed-form cumulative enclosed mass profile M(r):
M(r) = πρ0r03 { ln[(1 + x)2(1 + x2)] − 2 arctan(x) } where x = r/r0
Evaluating M(r) at the core radius (r = r0, x = 1) gives the core mass M0 = M(r0) = πρ0r03(ln 8 − π/2) ≈ 1.6005ρ0r03. At small radii (x ≪ 1), M(r) ≈ (4π/3)ρ0r3, so the circular orbital velocity vc(r) = [GM(r)/r]1/2 rises linearly with radius (solid-body rotation, vc(r) ≈ (4πGρ0/3)1/2r). The circular velocity curve reaches its global maximum vmax at radius rmax ≈ 3.2446*r*0 with vmax ≈ 0.8636(4πGρ0r02)1/2. Beyond rmax, the enclosed mass diverges logarithmically as M(r) ≈ 4πρ0r03 ln(r/r0) and is truncated at the virial radius r200.
| Halo Profile Model | 3D Density Law ρ(r) | Inner Slope γ(0) | Outer Slope γ(∞) | Inner Rotation Curve vc(r) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burkert Profile (1995) | ρ0r03/[(r + r0)(r2 + r02)] | 0 (flat core) | −3 | Linear rise (vc ∝ r) |
| Pseudo-Isothermal Sphere | ρ0/[1 + (r/rc)2] | 0 (flat core) | −2 | Linear rise (vc ∝ r) |
| Navarro–Frenk–White (NFW) | ρs/[(r/rs)(1 + r/rs)2] | −1 (cusp) | −3 | Square-root rise (vc ∝ r1/2) |
| Einasto Profile (1965) | ρ−2 exp{−(2/α)[(r/r−2)α − 1]} | 0 (curved slope) | Steep (> 3) | Power-law rise |
| Hernquist Profile (1990) | (Ma)/[2πr(r + a)3] | −1 (cusp) | −4 | Square-root rise (vc ∝ r1/2) |
Gravitational Potential and Projected Lensing Surface Density
Applying Newton's shell theorem to integrate the inward gravitational field g(r) = −GM(r)/r2 yields the analytical gravitational potential Φ(r) of the Burkert sphere (with Φ(∞) = 0):
Φ(r) = −πGρ0r02 { π − 2(1 + 1/x) arctan(x) + 2(1 + 1/x) ln(1 + x) − (1 − 1/x) ln(1 + x2) }
At the halo center (x → 0), the potential converges to a finite depth Φ(0) = −π2Gρ0r02, corresponding to a central escape speed vesc(0) = (21/2π)(Gρ0)1/2r0. Solving the spherical Jeans equations for a tracer stellar population embedded inside a Burkert halo (such as red-giant stars in Milky Way dwarf spheroidal satellites) allows dynamicists to infer ρ0 and r0 from line-of-sight radial velocity dispersions while accounting for orbital velocity anisotropy via the collisionless Boltzmann equation and Eddington inversion formula. Projecting the Burkert density along the line of sight for gravitational lensing gives a central surface mass density Σ(0) = 2 ∫0∞ ρ(r) dr = (π/2 + ln 2)ρ0r0 ≈ 2.2639ρ0r0.
Universal Dark-Matter Scaling Relations and the Core–Cusp Problem
When Burkert (1995) fitted his profile to the H I rotation curves of dwarf irregular galaxies, he discovered that lower-luminosity galaxies with smaller core radii r0 systematically possess higher central densities ρ0. Subsequent analyses by Paolo Salucci and Andreas Burkert (2000) and Donato et al. (2009) across more than 1,000 galaxies spanning 14 magnitudes in luminosity (MB = −8 to −22) demonstrated that the central dark-matter surface density μ0D ≡ ρ0r0 is nearly constant across galaxy masses and Hubble types:
log10(ρ0r0 / [M☉ pc−2]) = 2.15 ± 0.20 (or ρ0r0 ≈ 140+80−50 M☉ pc−2)
To reconcile the constant-density cores of the Burkert profile with the cuspy inner halos predicted by dark-matter-only ΛCDM simulations, hydrodynamical models invoke bursty star formation and repeated supernova-driven gas outflows that fluctuate the central gravitational potential (∂Φ/∂t ≠ 0) and pump orbital energy into central dark-matter particles (Pontzen & Governato, 2012), alongside particle-physics models of self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) and ultra-light bosonic dark matter.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the Burkert profile differ from the pseudo-isothermal sphere?
Both models feature a flat central core ρ(0) = ρ0 and produce a linearly rising inner rotation curve. However, at large radii (r ≫ r0) the pseudo-isothermal sphere ρ(r) = ρ0/(1 + r2/rc2) falls off as r−2, whereas the Burkert profile falls off as r−3, matching the outer density slope of cosmological NFW halos.
What is the universal central surface density relation for Burkert halos?
Rotation-curve decompositions and dwarf-spheroidal Jeans equations analyses show that the product of the Burkert central density ρ0 and core radius r0 is approximately constant across galaxies spanning six orders of magnitude in luminosity: ρ0r0 ≈ 140 M☉ pc−2 (≈ 0.03 g cm−2).
At what radius does the Burkert circular velocity reach its peak?
The circular velocity vc(r) = [GM(r)/r]1/2 of a Burkert halo reaches its maximum value vmax ≈ 0.864(4πGρ0r02)1/2 at rmax ≈ 3.245*r*0, beyond which vc(r) declines slowly as [ln(r/r0)/(r/r0)]1/2.
References
- Burkert, A. (1995). "The structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies." The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 447(1), L25–L28. https://doi.org/10.1086/309560
- Salucci, P., & Burkert, A. (2000). "Dark Matter Scaling Relations." The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 537(1), L9–L12. https://doi.org/10.1086/312747
- Donato, F., Gentile, G., Salucci, P., Frigerio Martins, C., Wilkinson, M. I., Gilmore, G., Grebel, E. K., Koch, A., & Wyse, R. (2009). "A constant dark matter halo surface density in galaxies." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 397(3), 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15004.x
- Pontzen, A., & Governato, F. (2012). "How supernova feedback turns dark matter cusps into cores." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 421(4), 3464–3471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20571.x
- Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. (2017). "Small-Scale Challenges to the ΛCDM Paradigm." Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 55, 343–387. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313