Kaiser Effect (Cosmology)
The Kaiser effect is a large-scale cosmological redshift-space distortion derived by Nick Kaiser in 1987 in which coherent gravitational infall of galaxies toward overdense structures squashes clustering contours along the line of sight and amplifies the anisotropic galaxy power spectrum.
The Kaiser effect is a linear-regime cosmological redshift-space distortion (RSD) derived by British cosmologist Nick Kaiser in 1987 that describes the apparent flattening ("squashing") of large-scale galaxy clustering along the observer's line of sight and the resulting angular anisotropy of the three-dimensional galaxy power spectrum Ps(k). In spectroscopic galaxy redshift surveys, the radial comoving distance to each galaxy is inferred from its observed spectroscopic redshift zobs, which sums the cosmological Hubble expansion with the Doppler shift from the galaxy's line-of-sight peculiar velocity v∥. On large scales (r ≳ 10–30 h−1 Mpc) where density perturbations remain in the linear regime, galaxies fall coherently inward toward overdense superclusters and stream outward from underdense cosmic voids. Because foreground galaxies infalling toward a cluster center have positive peculiar velocities away from the observer while background galaxies infalling toward the same center have negative peculiar velocities toward the observer, their redshift-space positions are compressed together along the line of sight—providing modern cosmology's primary observational probe of the linear growth rate of structure f(Ωm) and tests of general relativity on cosmological scales.
Mapping from Real Space to Redshift Space
In a Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) universe with scale factor a(t) = (1 + z)−1 and Hubble parameter H(z), a galaxy located at true comoving position r possessing peculiar velocity v(r) exhibits an apparent comoving position s in redshift space shifted along the unit line-of-sight vector n̂:
s = r + [v∥(r) / (aH)] n̂, where v∥(r) = v(r) · n̂
Because the total number of galaxies in a comoving volume element is conserved between real space and redshift space, the apparent galaxy number density ns(s) and true number density nr(r) satisfy the continuity condition [1 + δg,s(s)] d3s = [1 + δg,r(r)] d3r. In the plane-parallel (distant-observer) approximation along line-of-sight coordinate z = r · n̂, the Jacobian determinant of the coordinate transformation is |∂s/∂r| = 1 + (aH)−1 ∂v∥/∂z. Expanding to first linear order in the perturbations (|δg,r| ≪ 1 and |(aH)−1 ∂v∥/∂z| ≪ 1) yields the fundamental real-to-redshift-space overdensity mapping:
δg,s(r) = δg,r(r) − (1 / aH) (∂v∥ / ∂z)
In the linear regime of cosmological perturbation theory (the same regime that seeds halo collapse in the Press–Schechter formalism), the linearized continuity equation for collisionless dark matter relates the velocity divergence θ = ∇ · v to the time derivative of the linear growth factor D(a):
∇ · v = −aH f δm(r), where f ≡ d ln D / d ln a is the dimensionless linear growth rate
Taking the Fourier transform v(k) = i aH f (k / k2) δm(k) and defining μ ≡ k** · n̂ / k = cos θ** as the cosine of the angle between the wavevector k and the line of sight, the radial velocity gradient in Fourier space evaluates to −(aH)−1 ∂v∥/∂z → f μ2 δm(k).
The Kaiser Formula, Anisotropic Power Spectrum, and Multipole Expansion
Because luminous galaxies (whose abundance follows the Schechter luminosity function) form preferentially inside high-density peaks of the underlying dark-matter distribution, their real-space overdensity on large linear scales is related to the matter overdensity by the linear galaxy bias b, such that δg,r(k) = b δm(k). Substituting δm(k) = δg,r(k) / b into the Fourier-transformed redshift-space relation yields Kaiser's 1987 linear amplification formula:
δg,s(k) = (1 + β μ2) δg,r(k) = (b + f μ2) δm(k)
where β ≡ f(Ωm) / b is the dimensionless redshift-space distortion parameter. Squaring the Fourier amplitude ensemble average produces the anisotropic redshift-space galaxy power spectrum:
Ps(k, μ) = (1 + β μ2)2 Pg,r(k) = (b + f μ2)2 Pm,r(k)
Notice the directional dependence on μ = cos θ:
- Transverse Modes (μ = 0, k** ⊥ n̂):** Modes perpendicular to the line of sight are completely unaffected by peculiar velocities, giving Ps(k, 0) = b2 Pm,r(k).
- Line-of-Sight Modes (μ = ±1, k** ∥ n̂):** Modes parallel to the line of sight are amplified by the coherent infall factor (1 + β)2, giving Ps(k, 1) = (1 + β)2 b2 Pm,r(k).
In observational analyses of spectroscopic surveys (such as 2dFGRS, SDSS-III BOSS/eBOSS, and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument [DESI]), Ps(k, μ) is decomposed into orthogonal Legendre polynomials Lℓ(μ) = {1, (3μ2 − 1)/2, (35μ4 − 30μ2 + 3)/8} for the monopole (ℓ = 0), quadrupole (ℓ = 2), and hexadecapole (ℓ = 4) moments:
P0(k) = [1 + (2/3)β + (1/5)β2] Pg,r(k) P2(k) = [(4/3)β + (4/7)β2] Pg,r(k) P4(k) = (8/35)β2 Pg,r(k)
Measuring the ratio of the quadrupole P2(k) to the monopole P0(k) breaks the degeneracy between galaxy bias b and the growth rate f, directly determining the combination f(z) σ8(z), where σ8(z) is the root-mean-square linear matter fluctuation in 8 h−1 Mpc spheres.
| Redshift-Space Regime | Spatial / Wavevector Scale | Dominant Physical Velocity Field | 2D Correlation Function ξ(σ⊥, π∥) Geometry | Mathematical Spectral Modification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear Kaiser Effect (1987) | r ≳ 15–100 h−1 Mpc (k ≲ 0.1 h Mpc−1) | Coherent gravitational infall toward superclusters (∇ · v = −*aHf*δm) | Squashed ("Pancake-of-God") contours compressed along line of sight π∥ | Multiplication by (b + fμ2)2; positive quadrupole P2(k) > 0 |
| Quasi-Linear Transition Zone | r ≈ 5–15 h−1 Mpc (k ≈ 0.1–0.25 h Mpc−1) | Coupling of non-linear density evolution and velocity divergence (Pδθ, Pθθ) | Transition from oblate squashing to inner axial elongation | Scoccimarro (2004) / Taruya–Nishimichi–Saito (TNS) perturbation models |
| Non-Linear "Fingers of God" (Jackson 1972) | r ≲ 1–3 h−1 Mpc (k ≳ 0.3 h Mpc−1) | Random virialized orbital motions inside Navarro–Frenk–White cluster halos | Elongated radial spikes pointing directly at the observer along π∥ | Damping factor DFoG(kμσv) = [1 + (kμσv)2/2]−2 or exp[−(kμσv)2] |
Kaiser Squashing vs. Small-Scale "Fingers of God"
In a two-dimensional plot of the anisotropic galaxy two-point correlation function ξ(σ⊥, π∥) as a function of transverse separation σ⊥ and line-of-sight separation π∥, the linear Kaiser effect competes against a small-scale non-linear distortion known as the Fingers of God effect (discovered by John C. Jackson in 1972):
- On Large Linear Scales (σ⊥ > 10 h−1 Mpc): Coherent bulk infall compresses iso-correlation contours along π∥ into oblate, horizontally flattened ellipses (Kaiser squashing).
- On Small Virialized Scales (σ⊥ < 2 h−1 Mpc): Inside collapsed galaxy clusters—where galaxies orbit within deep Navarro–Frenk–White profile or Einasto profile potentials governed by the Jeans equations with random velocity dispersions σv ≈ 500–1,200 km s−1—large random Doppler shifts scatter galaxies by Δπ∥ = σv / (aH) ≈ 5–12 h−1 Mpc along the line of sight, stretching clusters into radial needles pointing at the observer (Fingers of God). Phenomenological dispersion models combine both effects as Ps(k, μ) = (b + fμ2)2 Pm,r(k) FFoG(k2 μ2 σv2).
Testing General Relativity with the Growth Index γ
Because the expansion history H(z) alone cannot distinguish a cosmological constant (ΛCDM) from modified gravity theories that produce the same background expansion, measuring f(z) via the Kaiser effect tests the gravitational Poisson equation directly. Parametrizing the linear growth rate as f(z) ≈ Ωm(z)γ (Linder, 2005), standard general relativity in ΛCDM predicts a growth index γGR ≈ 6/11 ≈ 0.545, whereas five-dimensional Dvali–Gabadadze–Porrati (DGP) braneworld gravity predicts γDGP ≈ 11/16 ≈ 0.687. Precision Kaiser RSD measurements from SDSS BOSS/eBOSS and DESI across 0.1 < z < 2.1 confirm γ = 0.55 ± 0.04 in agreement with general relativity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does the Kaiser effect squash structures along the line of sight instead of stretching them?
On large scales (>10 Mpc), an overdense supercluster has not yet undergone virialization and orbit crossing; instead, galaxies on the near side are falling away from the observer toward the cluster center (increasing their redshift), while galaxies on the far side are falling toward the observer (decreasing their redshift). In redshift space, near-side and far-side galaxies are therefore shifted closer to the cluster's central redshift, compressing the structure along the line of sight.
What is the difference between the Kaiser effect and the Alcock–Paczyński effect?
Both effects introduce line-of-sight anisotropy into galaxy clustering, but the Kaiser effect is a dynamical distortion caused by peculiar velocities (v∥), whereas the Alcock–Paczyński effect (1979) is a purely geometric distortion that occurs if an incorrect cosmological model (H(z) and angular diameter distance DA(z)) is assumed when converting redshifts and angles into comoving coordinates.
Why do cosmologists report f*sigma_8 instead of the growth rate f alone?
In the linear regime, the amplitude of the real-space matter power spectrum scales with σ82(z), so the galaxy monopole scales as (bσ8)2 and the quadrupole scales as (bσ8)(fσ8). Combining the monopole and quadrupole eliminates the unknown galaxy bias combination bσ8 and yields a model-independent measurement of the product f(z)σ8(z).
References
- Kaiser, N. (1987). "Clustering in real space and in redshift space." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 227(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/227.1.1
- Hamilton, A. J. S. (1998). "Linear redshift distortions: a review." In D. Hamilton (Ed.), The Evolving Universe (Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 231, pp. 185–275). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4960-0_17
- Scoccimarro, R. (2004). "Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities, and nonlinearities." Physical Review D, 70(8), 083007. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083007
- Peacock, J. A., Cole, S., Norberg, P., Baugh, C. M., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R. D., Colless, M., Collins, C., Couch, W., Dalton, G., De Propris, R., Driver, S. P., Efstathiou, G., Ellis, R. S., Frenk, C. S., Glazebrook, K., Jackson, C., Lahav, O., ... Taylor, K. (2001). "A measurement of the cosmological mass density from clustering in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey." Nature, 410(6825), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065528
- Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., Comparat, J., Cuesta, A. J., Dawson, K. S., Eisenstein, D. J., Escoffier, S., Gil-Marín, H., Grieb, J. N., Hand, N., Ho, S., ... Zhao, G.-B. (2017). "The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 470(3), 2617–2652. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx721