โ† Wiki Index / Earth & Climate Systems / Marine Ice Sheet Instability
๐ŸŒ Earth & Climate Systems

Marine Ice Sheet Instability

Marine Ice Sheet Instability is a nonlinear glaciological positive feedback affecting ice sheets grounded below sea level on retrograde bedrock slopes that deepen inland, where grounding-line retreat increases ice thickness and ice discharge flux until the grounding line reaches an upward-sloping bed.

Marine Ice Sheet Instability (abbreviated MISI) is a nonlinear dynamical positive feedback and cryospheric tipping point that governs the stability and irreversible retreat of marine ice sheetsโ€”continental ice sheets whose bedrock base lies below sea level and whose margins terminate in the ocean as floating ice shelves. First hypothesized in 1974 by glaciologist Johannes Weertman (and applied to the West Antarctic Ice Sheet by John H. Mercer in 1978 and Terry Hughes in 1981), and proven mathematically via asymptotic boundary-layer theory by Christian Schoof in 2007, Marine Ice Sheet Instability occurs whenever an unbuttressed marine ice sheet's grounding line (the transition boundary where grounded continental ice becomes buoyant and begins to float as an ice shelf) rests on a retrograde bedrock slopeโ€”a submarine bed that deepens inland toward the interior of the ice sheet. Because ice discharge flux across the grounding line scales as a high power of ice thickness (qg โˆ hg3 to hg5), any initial retreat of the grounding line into deeper water increases the local ice thickness at the grounding line, accelerating ice outflow, thinning the upstream ice, and driving self-sustaining retreat until the grounding line reaches a shallow, prograde (upward-sloping) bedrock ridge.

Glaciological Physics: Grounding-Line Flux Law and Schoof's (2007) Theorem

Consider a marine ice sheet resting on a submarine bedrock elevation b(x) below sea level (b(x) < 0, where x increases seaward). At the grounding line (x = xg), the grounded ice of thickness hg transitions from resting on the bed to floating hydrostatically in seawater of density ฯw โ‰ˆ 1,028 kg mโˆ’3. By Archimedes' hydrostatic flotation criterion, the ice thickness hg at the grounding line is directly fixed by the water depth โˆ’b(xg):

ฯi hg = โˆ’ ฯw b(xg)   โŸน   hg(xg) = โˆ’ (ฯw / ฯi) b(xg) โ‰ˆ โˆ’1.12 b(xg)

where ฯi โ‰ˆ 917 kg mโˆ’3 is the density of glacial ice.

In 2007, mathematician Christian Schoof used matched asymptotic expansions of the Shallow Shelf / Shallow Stream Approximation (SSA) coupled with Glen's flow law (strain rate ฮตฬ‡xx = A ฯ„xxn, with creep exponent n โ‰ˆ 3) and Weertman's basal sliding law (ฯ„b = C ubm, with m โ‰ˆ 1/3) across the narrow membrane-stress transition zone around the grounding line. Schoof proved that for an unbuttressed two-dimensional marine ice sheet, the ice volume flux per unit width across the grounding line (qg = hg ug) is an increasing, superlinear power-law function of grounding-line thickness hg:

qg(xg) = [ A (ฯi g)n+1 (1 โˆ’ ฯi / ฯw)n / (4n C) ]1/(m+1) ยท hg(m+n+3)/(m+1)   โˆ   hgฮฒ

For standard glaciological parameters (n = 3 and m = 1/3), the flux exponent is:

ฮฒ = (m + n + 3) / (m + 1) = (19/3) / (4/3) = 19/4 = 4.75   (typically ฮฒ โ‰ˆ 3 to 5 across sliding laws).

Conservation of ice mass requires that the grounding line advance or retreat at rate dxg/dt determined by the imbalance between total upstream catchment snow accumulation Qin(xg) = โˆซ0xg a(x) dx and grounding-line discharge qg(xg). Linear stability perturbation around a steady-state grounding-line position (Qin(xg) = qg(xg)) yields two opposite regimes depending on the sign of the bedrock slope db/dx at x = xg:

Bedrock Slope GeometryMathematical ConditionResponse to Small Retreat Perturbation (ฮ”xg < 0)Stability Classification
Prograde (Normal) Bed Slope (Bed shallows inland, deepens seaward)db / dx < 0Retreating inland (ฮ”xg < 0) moves the grounding line onto shallower bedrock, reducing flotation thickness hg; discharge flux qg โˆ hg4.75 drops below upstream snowfall accumulation (qg < Qin), thickening the ice and pushing the grounding line back seaward to equilibrium.Stable Equilibrium (Negative feedback restores grounding-line position).
Retrograde (Reverse) Bed Slope (Bed deepens inland into a subglacial basin)db / dx > 0Retreating inland (ฮ”xg < 0) moves the grounding line into deeper water, increasing flotation thickness hg; discharge flux qg โˆ hg4.75 jumps above upstream snowfall accumulation (qg > Qin), drawing down the interior ice and driving runaway retreat across the entire retrograde slope.Unstable Tipping Point (MISI) (Positive feedback drives irreversible retreat until reaching a prograde ridge).

Stabilizing Counter-Mechanisms: Ice-Shelf Buttressing and Solid-Earth Isostatic Rebound

In real three-dimensional Antarctic fjords and embayments, two physical processes can stabilize a grounding line even when it rests on a retrograde bed (db/dx > 0):

  1. Ice-Shelf Buttressing (Gudmundsson et al., 2012; Pegler, 2018): Most Antarctic marine ice streams do not calve directly at the grounding line; instead, they flow out into floating ice shelves confined within narrow coastal embayments or pinned against submarine seabed highs (ice rises and pinning points). Lateral shear stress along the embayment sidewalls and drag over pinning points exert a compressive back-stress (ฯƒbutt) on the grounding line, modifying Schoof's flux formula by a dimensionless buttressing factor ฮ˜ โˆˆ (0, 1]:
qg โˆ ฮ˜n / (m+1) hgฮฒ

As Hilmar Gudmundsson (2012, 2013) demonstrated in three-dimensional modeling, if grounding-line retreat into a confined embayment increases the length and lateral drag of the floating ice shelf fast enough that ฮ˜ decreases more rapidly than hg increases, ice-shelf buttressing can stabilize a grounding line on a retrograde bed. Conversely, when warm Southern Annular Modeโ€“driven Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) intrudes beneath the ice shelf and thins it from below (or unpins it from a seabed ridge), ฮ˜ โ†’ 1, removing the buttressing brake and triggering MISI.

  1. Rapid Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) and Gravitational Sea-Level Fingerprints (Gomez et al., 2010, 2015): As a marine ice stream thins and loses mass during retreat, two rapid solid-Earth and gravitational feedbacks reduce the local water depth at the grounding line:
    • Diminished gravitational attraction of the shrinking ice sheet causes the local ocean surface (the geoid) immediately adjacent to the grounding line to fall, lowering local relative sea level.
    • Because the upper mantle beneath the West Antarctic Rift System has an unusually low viscosity (ฮท โ‰ˆ 1018โ€“1019 Pa s, 100 to 1,000 times less viscous than cratonic East Antarctica), crustal elastic and viscoelastic isostatic uplift rebounds upward on decadal-to-centennial timescales (at rates up to 40โ€“50 mm yrโˆ’1 observed by GPS in the Amundsen Sea sector, Barletta et al., 2018), shallowing the bedrock beneath the grounding line and slowing MISI retreat.

Vulnerable Antarctic Sectors: Thwaites Glacier, Pine Island Glacier, and East Antarctic Basins

Airborne ice-penetrating radar surveys (compiled in the BedMachine Antarctica high-resolution subglacial topography dataset by Mathieu Morlighem et al., 2020) reveal that marine-based ice grounded on retrograde beds below sea level holds a total global sea-level equivalent (SLE) of ~22.5 meters:

Ice Sheet Sector & Major GlaciersMaximum Subglacial Bed Depth Below Sea LevelGlobal Sea-Level Equivalent (SLE)Current Observational & Stability Status
West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) โ€” Amundsen Sea Embayment (Thwaites, Pine Island, Smith, Pope, and Kohler Glaciers)โˆ’1,200 to โˆ’2,555 m (Bentley Subglacial Trench reaches โˆ’2,555 m)~3.3 meters total WAIS (1.2 m from Amundsen Sea sector alone; 0.65 m from Thwaites Glacier)Active MISI Underway (Rignot et al., 2014; Joughin et al., 2014): Since the 1990s, warm Circumpolar Deep Water (+1.2 ยฐC) has melted grounding-line cavities at 30โ€“100 m yrโˆ’1; grounding lines have retreated 15โ€“40 km onto deep retrograde beds lacking major stabilizing ridges for 200+ km inland.
East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) โ€” Wilkes Subglacial Basin (Cook, Ninnis, and Mertz Glaciers)โˆ’1,000 to โˆ’2,100 m~3.0 to 4.0 metersGuarded by a coastal marine ice plug (~80 million m3 of ice); Mengel & Levermann (2014) showed that melting this coastal plug triggers irreversible MISI drainage of the Wilkes Basin over 500โ€“2,000 years (as occurred during the Pliocene ~3 Ma).
East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) โ€” Aurora Subglacial Basin (Totten and Moscow University Ice Shelves)โˆ’1,100 to โˆ’3,500 m (Totten southern trough reaches โˆ’2.5 km)~3.5 to 5.1 metersTotten Glacier alone drains a catchment holding 3.85 m SLE; deep submarine canyons discovered in 2015โ€“2017 allow modified Circumpolar Deep Water to reach Totten's grounding line, driving active basal melt and grounding-line thinning.
East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) โ€” Recovery & Pensacola Basins (Filchnerโ€“Ronne Ice Shelf)โˆ’1,200 to โˆ’2,200 m~3.0 to 4.0 metersCurrently buttressed by the cold-cavity Filchnerโ€“Ronne Ice Shelf; vulnerable if >2โ€“3 ยฐC warming redirects warm Weddell Gyre deep water into the Filchner Trough.

Marine Ice Cliff Instability (MICI) vs. Marine Ice Sheet Instability (MISI)

In 2015 and 2016, David Pollard, Robert M. DeConto, and Richard B. Alley proposed a distinct, structurally driven mechanical instability that could compound MISI under high-emission warming scenariosโ€”termed Marine Ice Cliff Instability (MICI):

  • Hydrofracturing of Buttressing Ice Shelves: If intense surface atmospheric warming generates meltwater ponds on top of a floating ice shelf, dense liquid water percolating into crevasses drives rapid hydrofracture that disintegrates the floating ice shelf within weeks (as observed during the March 2002 collapse of the Larsen B Ice Shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula).
  • Subaerial Ice-Cliff Structural Failure (>90โ€“100 m Cliff Height): If an ice shelf collapses over a deep marine grounding line (hg > 800โ€“1,000 m), it exposes an unbuttressed vertical ice cliff rising >90 to 100 meters above the sea surface. Because the longitudinal tensile and shear stresses at the base of a subaerial cliff taller than ~90โ€“100 m exceed the yield tensile/shear strength of glacial ice (~1 MPa), the cliff face fails mechanically by brittle slumping and calving (Bassis & Walker, 2012), exposing an even taller cliff further inland along the retrograde bed. Subsequent laboratory and viscoelastic damage-mechanics studies (Bassis et al., 2021; Crawford et al., 2021) demonstrated that whether MICI triggers runaway collapse depends on the rate of ice-shelf removal versus viscous creep relaxation and mรฉlange back-stress inside the fjord.

Recent Events

In 2020, compilation of the high-resolution BedMachine Antarctica mass-conservation subglacial topography dataset mapped deep retrograde submarine troughs exceeding 2,000 meters below sea level beneath Thwaites, Pine Island, Denman, and Totten glaciers, refining spatial vulnerability assessments for Marine Ice Sheet Instability across both West and East Antarctica (Morlighem et al., 2020).

In 2022, autonomous underwater vehicle multibeam sonar surveys of the deglaciated seafloor in front of Thwaites Glacier documented rib-like tidal grounding-line corrugations showing that during a prior warm pulse the glacier retreated down its retrograde bed slope at rates exceeding 2.1 kilometers per yearโ€”more than double its satellite-observed retreat rate between 2011 and 2019 (Graham et al., 2022).

In 2024, high-resolution synthetic aperture radar interferometry from the commercial ICEYE satellite constellation demonstrated that warm, high-pressure seawater intrudes 2 to 6 kilometers upstream of the nominal grounding line beneath Thwaites Glacier during spring tides, creating a dynamic grounding-zone boundary layer that amplifies basal melt on retrograde bedrock slopes (Rignot et al., 2024).

References

  1. Weertman, J. (1974). Stability of the junction of an ice sheet and an ice shelf. Journal of Glaciology, 13(67), 3โ€“11.
  2. Schoof, C. (2007). Ice sheet grounding line dynamics: Steady states, stability, and hysteresis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 112(F4), F04028.
  3. Joughin, I., Smith, B. E., & Medley, B. (2014). Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West Antarctica. Science, 344(6185), 735โ€“738.
  4. Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., Morlighem, M., Seroussi, H., & Scheuchl, B. (2014). Widespread, rapid grounding line retreat of Pine Island, Thwaites, Smith, and Kohler glaciers, West Antarctica, from 1992 to 2011. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(10), 3502โ€“3509.
  5. Morlighem, M., Rignot, E., Binder, T., Blankenship, D., Drews, R., Eagles, G., et al. (2020). Deep glacial troughs and stabilizing ridges unveiled beneath the margins of the Antarctic ice sheet. Nature Geoscience, 13(2), 132โ€“137.
  6. Graham, A. G. C., Wรฅhlin, A., Hogan, K. A., Nitsche, F. O., Heywood, K. J., Totten, R. L., et al. (2022). Rapid retreat of Thwaites Glacier in the pre-satellite era. Nature Geoscience, 15(9), 706โ€“713.
  7. Rignot, E., Ciracรฌ, E., Scheuchl, B., Tolpekin, V., Wollersheim, M., & Dow, C. (2024). Widespread seawater intrusions beneath the grounded ice of Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(22), e2404766121.
๐Ÿงฌ Support Open Science
Explore interactive science games on LowKey Games or browse scientific apparel & accessories in the CRV Science Shop.
๐Ÿ’ก Spot an inaccuracy or have primary literature to expand this article?
Submit a citation or revision note using your shared CRV Science / LowKey Games profile ID.
Suggest Revision