Tully-Fisher Relation
The Tully-Fisher relation is an empirical astrophysical scaling law linking the intrinsic luminosity or total baryonic mass of a spiral galaxy to the fourth power of its asymptotic rotational velocity, serving as both a cornerstone of the extragalactic distance ladder and a probe of dark matter halo dynamics.
Tully-Fisher relation (TFR) is an empirical astrophysical scaling law for rotationally supported spiral galaxies (and irregular disk galaxies), demonstrating that a galaxy's intrinsic luminosity L (or total baryonic mass Mb) is proportional to roughly the fourth power of its maximum or asymptotic circular rotational velocity (L ∝ Vrotα, with exponent α ≈ 3.0 to 4.0 depending on photometric bandpass). Discovered in 1977 by the astronomers R. Brent Tully and J. Richard Fisher using neutral hydrogen (H I) 21-centimeter line-width observations at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO)—as the disk-galaxy counterpart to the Faber-Jackson relation for elliptical spheroids—the Tully–Fisher relation serves two key roles in modern astrophysics: (1) it acts as one of the primary secondary standardizable candles on the extragalactic distance ladder (measuring distances to tens of thousands of spiral galaxies out to ~100–200 megaparsecs to map local peculiar velocity flows, the Laniakea Supercluster, and the Hubble constant H0); and (2) in its generalized mass form—the Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation (BTFR, Mb ∝ Vflat4)—it imposes a tight empirical constraint on the coupling between luminous baryons and dark matter halos across five orders of magnitude in galaxy mass.
Observational Measurement: 21-cm H I Line Widths and Inclination Correction
How did Tully and Fisher measure the intrinsic luminosity of a distant spiral galaxy solely from its radio spectrum without knowing its distance d?
- Neutral Hydrogen (H I) 21-cm Global Profile (W20 and W50): Cold atomic hydrogen gas (H I) in a spiral galaxy disk extends far beyond the optical stellar disk into the flat outer region of the galaxy's rotation curve, emitting the hyperfine spin-flip transition at rest frequency ν0 = 1420.40575 MHz (λ0 = 21.106 cm). When a single-dish radio telescope (such as Green Bank, Arecibo, or Parkes) observes an inclined rotating spiral galaxy, gas on the side of the disk rotating toward the observer is Doppler-blueshifted (+Vrot sin i), while gas on the receding side is Doppler-redshifted (−Vrot sin i). This produces a classic double-horned 21-cm velocity profile whose full width at 20% or 50% of peak flux (W20 or W50, corrected for instrumental broadening and internal turbulent dispersion σgas ≈ 8–10 km/s) equals twice the projected rotation speed:
- Wcorr = 2 Vmax sin i.
- Optical/Near-Infrared Inclination Correction (i): Because a face-on galaxy (i = 0°) shows zero line-of-sight rotational Doppler shift (sin i = 0), Tully–Fisher measurements are restricted to spiral galaxies inclined at 45° ≤ i ≤ 80°. The inclination angle i is determined from the observed minor-to-major axial ratio (b / a) of the galaxy's outer optical or near-infrared isophotes using the Hubble oblateness formula:
- cos2 i = [ (b / a)2 − q02 ] / [ 1 − q02 ] (where q0 ≈ 0.13 to 0.20 is the intrinsic edge-on thickness ratio of a spiral disk).
- Distance Modulus Extraction (μ = m − M): Once the true de-projected rotation velocity Vmax = Wcorr / (2 sin i) is computed, plugging Vmax into the calibrated Tully–Fisher linear relation:
- Mλ = aλ + bλ [ log10(2 Vmax) − 2.5 ]
yields the galaxy's absolute magnitude Mλ. Comparing Mλ with the extinction-corrected apparent magnitude mλ directly yields the luminosity distance d = 10(mλ − Mλ − 25)/5 megaparsecs with a distance precision of ~15–20% per galaxy (0.30–0.40 mag scatter).
Wavelength Dependence and the Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation (BTFR)
In Tully and Fisher's original 1977 blue-band (B-band, λ ≈ 440 nm) photographic measurements, the slope of the relation was relatively shallow (LB ∝ Vmax2.5–3.0) and exhibited substantial scatter (~0.5–0.7 magnitudes) for two physical reasons: (a) blue light is heavily attenuated by internal interstellar dust extinction in inclined spiral disks, and (b) blue luminosity is dominated by short-lived, massive O and B main-sequence stars formed in stochastic recent starbursts rather than the long-lived low-mass stellar population that dominates the galaxy's stellar mass M*.
When astronomers (Marc Aaronson, Jeremy Mould, and John Huchra, 1979) shifted observations to the near-infrared (H, Ks, and Spitzer 3.6 μm bands), where dust extinction is negligible (< 0.05 mag) and light traces old K and M giant/dwarf stars proportional to total stellar mass M*, the slope steepened to LNIR ∝ Vflat3.8–4.0 and the intrinsic scatter dropped below 0.25–0.35 magnitudes.
| Tully–Fisher Variant | Measured Ordinate (y-axis) | Velocity Abscissa (x-axis) | Empirical Power-Law Slope (α in y ∝ Vα) | Intrinsic Scatter & Applicable Galaxy Regime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optical B-Band TFR (1977) | Blue Luminosity (LB, 440 nm) | Global H I line width (W20 / 2 sin i) | α ≈ 2.5 – 3.1 (slope bB ≈ −6.5 to −7.7 mag/dex) | Scatter ~0.50–0.65 mag; breaks down in gas-rich dwarf irregulars (Vrot < 90 km/s) due to starburst variability and internal dust |
| Near-Infrared (H / Ks / 3.6 μm) TFR | Old Stellar Disk Luminosity (L3.6μm) | Flat outer rotation speed (Vflat) | α ≈ 3.7 – 4.0 (slope b3.6 ≈ −9.5 to −10.0 mag/dex) | Scatter ~0.25–0.35 mag (~12–16% distance error); tight for high-surface-brightness spirals (Vflat > 100 km/s) |
| Stellar-Mass TFR (sTFR) | Stellar Mass (M = Υ · LNIR) | Asymptotic circular velocity (Vflat) | α ≈ 3.8 – 4.2 for massive spirals; curves steeply downward below Vflat < 90 km/s | Gas-rich low-surface-brightness (LSB) and dwarf irregular galaxies fall below the sTFR because most of their baryons are still in uncondensed H I gas |
| Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation (BTFR) | Total Baryonic Mass (Mb = M* + 1.33 MH I) | Flat outer dark-matter halo rotation velocity (Vflat) | α = 3.98 ± 0.06 (strictly Mb ∝ Vflat4) across 5 decades in mass (Mb = 106.5–1011.5 M☉) | Intrinsic scatter σlog M ≈ 0.06–0.11 dex (comparable to observational measurement error alone; Stacy McGaugh et al., 2000; Lelli et al., 2016) |
The Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation (BTFR) in Gas-Rich Dwarfs
A notable puzzle emerged in the 1990s: when astronomers plotted the Stellar-Mass Tully–Fisher Relation (M* vs. Vflat) down into the regime of low-mass, gas-rich dwarf irregular galaxies (Vflat ≈ 20 to 80 km/s), the power law broke down! Dwarf galaxies appeared under-luminous for their rotation speeds.
In 2000, Stacy S. McGaugh, James M. Schombert, Greg D. Bothun, and W. J. G. de Blok resolved this anomaly by recognizing that in low-mass dwarf disks, the majority of the luminous baryonic mass (50% to > 90%) has never been converted into stars—it remains in the form of neutral atomic hydrogen (H I) and primordial helium gas (Mgas ≈ 1.33 MH I). When the ordinate is replaced by the total baryonic mass (Mb = M* + 1.33 MH I), the downward curvature vanishes: dwarf irregulars (Vflat = 20 km/s) and giant spirals like the Andromeda Galaxy (Vflat = 250 km/s) fall onto a single, unbroken power law (Mb = A · Vflat4, where normalization A ≈ 47–50 M☉ km−4 s4) with minimal residual dependence on galaxy radius Rd or surface brightness Σ0.
Theoretical Origin: Virial Derivation, ΛCDM Feedback, and MOND
Why does a galaxy's baryonic mass scale with the fourth power of its rotation velocity? Starting from Newtonian gravity for a disk of mass M* and characteristic radius R rotating at circular speed V2 = G Mtot(R) / R:
- Squaring the circular velocity gives V4 = G2 Mtot2 / R2.
- Substituting the mean surface brightness I0 = L / (π R2) and total mass-to-light ratio (Mtot / L) eliminates R2, yielding:
- L = [ 1 / (π G2) ] · [ I0 ( Mtot / L )2 ]−1 · V4.
This simple derivation exposes the deep physical puzzle known as the Fine-Tuning Conspiracy of Low-Surface-Brightness (LSB) Galaxies: according to the equation above, two galaxies with the same Vflat but a 100-fold difference in surface brightness I0 should be offset from each other on the Tully–Fisher diagram by 5 magnitudes unless the product [I0 (Mtot / L)2] remains strictly constant (meaning lower-surface-brightness galaxies must be systematically more dark-matter dominated by the exact factor required to cancel their larger radius R).
- In the Standard ΛCDM Cosmological Paradigm: A spherical cold dark matter halo virializing at cosmic overdensity Δvir ≈ 200 satisfies the virial relation M200 ∝ H(z)−1 V2003 (a slope of 3, not 4!). To transform the primordial halo relation M200 ∝ V2003 into the observed baryonic relation Mb ∝ Vflat4, hydrodynamic galaxy-formation simulations (such as EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, and FIRE) invoke mass-dependent stellar feedback: in shallower dwarf-galaxy potential wells (V200 < 100 km/s), core-collapse supernova winds expel a progressively larger fraction of the primordial baryons from the disk, steepening the retained baryon fraction fb(V200) ∝ V2001.0 so that Mb = fb M200 ∝ Vflat4.
- In Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND, Mordehai Milgrom 1983): By contrast, if effective gravitational acceleration below a universal acceleration scale a0 ≈ 1.2 × 10−10 m s−2 transitions from the Newtonian regime (gN = G Mb / r2) to the deep-MOND regime (g = √(gN a0) = √(G Mb a0) / r), setting the centripetal acceleration Vflat2 / r equal to g cancels the radius r identically and yields an exact, zero-scatter fourth-power law (Vflat4 = G a0 Mb) independent of surface brightness I0. Reproducing the ultra-small intrinsic scatter (< 0.11 dex) and surface-brightness independence of the SPARC (Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves) BTFR dataset remains a primary benchmark for both self-interacting dark matter models and baryonic feedback simulations.
References
- Tully, R. B., & Fisher, J. R. (1977). A new method of determining distances to galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 54(3), 661–673. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977A%26A....54..661T
- Aaronson, M., Huchra, J., & Mould, J. (1979). The infrared luminosity/H I velocity-width relation and its application to the distance scale. The Astrophysical Journal, 229, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/156923
- McGaugh, S. S., Schombert, J. M., Bothun, G. D., & de Blok, W. J. G. (2000). The Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation. The Astrophysical Journal, 533(2), L99–L102. https://doi.org/10.1086/312628
- Lelli, F., McGaugh, S. S., & Schombert, J. M. (2016). The small scatter of the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 816(1), L14. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L14