wiki.crvscience.com • 521 Articles

Science Wiki

AI-assisted, human-supervised knowledge wiki spanning Earth & climate systems, genetics, molecular biophysics, vector entomology, and astrobiology.

← Wiki Index / Ecology & Biosphere / Food Web
🌿 Ecology & Biosphere

Food Web

A food web is the complex, interconnected network of feeding relationships and trophic energy fluxes linking primary producers, consumers, and decomposers within an ecological community.

Food web (originally termed a food cycle by the English ecologist Charles Elton in his landmark 1927 book Animal Ecology) is the holistic network of interconnected trophic interactions—who eats whom—through which solar or geochemical energy and elemental nutrients (carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus) flow across populations of organisms within an ecosystem. Whereas an idealized food chain depicts a simple, linear sequence of energy transfer (e.g., diatom → copepod → herring → salmon → killer whale), real ecological communities are structured as reticulate, multidirectional food webs characterized by omnivory (feeding across multiple trophic levels), ontogenetic diet shifts, microbial detrital loops, and parasitic links. Quantified thermodynamically by Raymond Lindeman's trophic-dynamic concept (1942), food web architecture governs community biodiversity, ecosystem stability, top-down trophic cascades, and the biomagnification of persistent organic toxins and heavy metals across the biosphere.

Trophic Architecture: How Are Organisms Partitioned Across Functional Guilds?

Every food web is anchored by basal autotrophs and partitioned into discrete trophic levels (TL)—or continuous fractional trophic positions (measured empirically via stable nitrogen isotope enrichment, δ15N, which increases by +3.0‰ to +3.4‰ per trophic step because consumers preferentially excrete lighter 14N in urea/ammonia while incorporating heavier 15N into body proteins):

Trophic Level (TL)Functional GuildPrimary Energy & Carbon SourceRepresentative OrganismsTypical Ecological Efficiency (Et)
Level 1.0 (TL = 1)Primary Producers (Autotrophs)Photosynthesis (solar radiation + CO2) or chemosynthesis (H2S, H2, CH4)Terrestrial plants, marine phytoplankton (diatoms, cyanobacteria), hydrothermal vent bacteria~1%–2% of incident solar radiation captured as Net Primary Production (NPP)
Level 2.0 (TL = 2)Primary Consumers (Herbivores)Living tissues of primary producers (foliage, seeds, sap, microalgae)Zooplankton (copepods, krill), ungulates, caterpillars, parrotfish~10%–20% (higher in pelagic algal grazers; lower on woody terrestrial plants)
Level 3.0 (TL = 3)Secondary Consumers (Primary Carnivores)Herbivorous primary consumersForage fish (herring, anchovies), insectivorous birds, spiders, frogs, ladybugs~10%–15% (high assimilation efficiency of animal protein/lipid)
Level 4.0–5.5 (TL ≥ 4)Tertiary & Apex PredatorsLower-tier carnivores and omnivores; experience minimal adult predationWolves, big cats, sharks, tunas, orcas, raptors~5%–10% (high metabolic maintenance costs in endothermic top predators)
Cross-Level LoopDecomposers & DetritivoresNon-living particulate & dissolved organic matter (detritus, carrion, feces, wood)Saprotrophic fungi, heterotrophic bacteria, earthworms, vultures, benthic polychaetesRoutes 50%–90% of terrestrial NPP back into mineral nutrients and microbial biomass

The Green Food Web vs. The Brown (Detrital) Food Web

Ecologists divide every ecosystem's trophic network into two coupled energy channels:

  1. The Green (Grazing) Food Web: Begins with the direct consumption of living plant or algal chloroplast-bearing tissue by herbivores. In pelagic marine ecosystems, rapid turnover of unicellular phytoplankton allows herbivorous zooplankton to consume 40% to 60% of Net Primary Production (NPP) directly.
  2. The Brown (Detrital) Food Web: Begins with dead organic matter (detritus—fallen leaves, woody debris, root exudates, fecal pellets, and carcasses) processed by saprotrophic fungi, bacteria, and detritivorous invertebrates. In temperate and tropical forests, herbivores consume less than 10% of living foliage; fully 80% to 90% of forest primary production enters the brown food web as litter, making fungal-bacterial decomposer loops the primary stabilizer of terrestrial food webs. In the sunlit ocean, 20% to 50% of fixed carbon leaks out of phytoplankton as dissolved organic matter (DOM) and is rescued back into the grazing food web via the microbial loop (heterotrophic bacteria → bacterivorous nanoflagellates → ciliates → copepods).

Lindeman's 10% Law: Why Are Food Chains Rarely Longer Than Four or Five Links?

In his foundational 1942 study of Cedar Bog Lake, Minnesota, Raymond Lindeman applied the second law of thermodynamics to trophic networks, establishing that energy flows unidirectionally through a food web and dissipates as metabolic heat at every transfer, whereas chemical nutrients cycle indefinitely.

The Components of Trophic Transfer Efficiency

When energy moves from trophic level n − 1 to trophic level n, the overall trophic transfer efficiency (TTE) or Lindeman's efficiency—averaging roughly 10% (ranging from 5% to 20%) across natural ecosystems—is the multiplicative product of three physiological efficiencies:

TTE = Consumption Efficiency (CE) × Assimilation Efficiency (AE) × Net Production Efficiency (NPE)
  1. Consumption (Exploitation) Efficiency (CE = In / Pn−1): The fraction of total net biomass production at level n − 1 that is actually ingested (In) by level n rather than dying unconsumed and entering the detrital pool.
  2. Assimilation Efficiency (AE = An / In): The percentage of ingested food energy absorbed across the gut wall into the consumer's body rather than egested as indigestible feces. Herbivores feeding on lignocellulosic wood or tough grasses have low AE (15%–40%), whereas carnivores digesting animal muscle and fat achieve high AE (80%–90%).
  3. Net Production Efficiency (NPE = Pn / An): The percentage of assimilated energy converted into new somatic growth and offspring biomass (Pn) rather than burned via cellular respiration (Rn) to generate ATP for basal metabolism, thermoregulation, and locomotion. Ectothermic invertebrates and fish exhibit high NPE (20%–40%), whereas endothermic birds and mammals expend 95%–98% of their assimilated calories maintaining a 37–40 °C body temperature, yielding a low NPE of only 1%–3%.

Because approximately 90% of available energy is lost at each link (leaving 100% → 10% → 1% → 0.1% → 0.01% of basal primary production by the fifth trophic level), available energy rapidly falls below the minimum viable population threshold required to support an additional predator guild—constraining almost all terrestrial and aquatic food chains to 4 to 5 trophic levels and generating the classic Eltonian Pyramid of Energy.

Keystone Species and Trophic Cascades: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Control

A central question in community ecology is whether populations within a food web are regulated bottom-up (by nutrient supply and primary productivity, as seen in eutrophication) or top-down (by predators suppressing prey populations). In 1960, Nelson Hairston, Frederick Smith, and Lawrence Slobodkin proposed the "Green World Hypothesis" (HSS Hypothesis): the terrestrial world remains green with abundant uneaten plant biomass because predators (level 3) keep folivorous herbivores (level 2) suppressed below the level at which they could defoliate vegetation (level 1).

Robert Paine's Keystone Species and Trophic Cascades

In 1966, ecologist Robert T. Paine experimentally removed the predatory purple ochre sea star (Pisaster ochraceus) from rocky intertidal shoreline plots at Mukkaw Bay, Washington. Without Pisaster preying on dominant filter-feeding mussels (Mytilus californianus), the mussels competitively monopolized all rock space, driving local benthic invertebrate and algal richness down from 15 species to just 8. Paine coined the term keystone species for an organism whose top-down impact on community structure is disproportionately large relative to its low biomass abundance.

When removing or restoring an apex predator propagates alternating positive and negative effects down three or more trophic levels (+ / − / + or − / + / −), the phenomenon is termed a trophic cascade:

  • The North Pacific Kelp Forest Cascade (James Estes): Sea otters (Enhydra lutris, level 3) prey heavily on herbivorous sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus, level 2), allowing dense underwater forests of giant kelp (Macrocystis and Nereocystis, level 1) to flourish and sequester carbon. Where maritime fur hunting or killer whale (Orcinus orca, level 4) predation decimated sea otter populations in the Aleutian Islands, sea urchin populations exploded and grazed the kelp forests down to desolate "urchin barrens."
  • The Yellowstone Wolf Reintroduction (1995): Reintroducing gray wolves (Canis lupus) to Yellowstone National Park altered the abundance and foraging behavior of elk (Cervus canadensis), releasing riparian willow (Salix) and aspen (Populus) stands from intense winter browsing and stabilizing streambanks.

Biomagnification: Why Do Lipophilic Toxins Concentrate in Apex Predators?

While energy dissipates by ~90% at each step up a food web, non-biodegradable, lipophilic (fat-soluble) chemical pollutants—and organometallic compounds like methylmercury (CH3Hg+)—do the exact opposite: they biomagnify, increasing in tissue concentration by 5- to 10-fold per trophic level and reaching concentrations 105 to 107 times higher in apex predators than in the surrounding water.

For a compound to undergo food-web biomagnification (as opposed to simple gill/dermal bioconcentration from water), it must possess two physicochemical properties:

  1. High Lipophilicity (Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient log Kow > 5): Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)—such as DDT/DDE, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, and brominated flame retardants—partition out of aqueous blood and cytosol into adipose lipid stores and cannot be excreted in aqueous urine.
  2. Metabolic Recalcitrance: The compound resists oxidative breakdown by hepatic cytochrome P450 monooxygenases.

Because a predator at trophic level n must consume roughly 10 kilograms of level n − 1 prey biomass to build 1 kilogram of its own body mass (Lindeman's 10% rule), it retains nearly 100% of the persistent toxin contained in all 10 kilograms of prey inside its 1 kilogram of tissue. As documented by Rachel Carson in Silent Spring (1962), DDT applied at 0.000003 ppm in water concentrated to 0.04 ppm in zooplankton, 0.5 ppm in minnows, 2.0 ppm in pickerel, and 25 ppm in ospreys and bald eagles—inhibiting Ca2+-ATPase in the avian shell gland, thinning eggshells, and causing catastrophic reproductive failure until DDT was banned in 1972.

Frequently Asked Scientific Questions

Why is an inverted biomass pyramid possible in the open ocean while an energy pyramid can never be inverted?

An energy pyramid measures energy flux per unit time (kJ m−2 yr−1) and can never be inverted because the second law of thermodynamics mandates respiratory heat loss at every trophic transfer. A biomass pyramid, however, measures the standing stock of mass at a single snapshot in time (g C m−2). In the oligotrophic ocean, microscopic phytoplankton divide every 1 to 3 days and are grazed immediately by long-lived copepods and fish (which live for months or years); thus, a tiny standing stock of rapidly dividing algae supports a larger standing stock of consumer biomass, just as a small bakery with rapid daily turnover feeds a large town.

How did Robert May challenge the classical belief that complex food webs are more stable than simple ones?

Early ecologists like Charles Elton and Eugene Odum observed that species-poor Arctic tundra and monoculture crops suffer violent population outbreaks, leading to the intuitive dogma that food-web complexity (high species richness and connectance) begets stability. In 1972, physicist-ecologist Robert May used random matrix theory to prove mathematically that in randomly connected model food webs, increasing species richness (S) and connectance (C) actually destabilizes the system. Subsequent food-web research resolved this paradox by showing that real biological food webs are non-random: they are stabilized by weak omnivorous links, body-size scaling, spatial compartmentalization, and coupling of fast green and slow brown energy channels.

Why is methylmercury dangerous in marine tuna and swordfish rather than in short-lived sardines?

In anoxic aquatic sediments, sulfate-reducing bacteria methylate inorganic mercury (Hg2+) into methylmercury (CH3Hg+), which mimics the amino acid methionine, crosses biological membranes, and binds tightly to sulfhydryl (–SH) groups in muscle proteins with a biological half-life of ~70 to 100 days. Small forage fish like sardines and anchovies feed low on the food web (TL ≈ 2.5) and live only 1 to 3 years, accumulating very little mercury. Long-lived apex predators like bluefin tuna, swordfish, and sharks feed at TL 4.5 to 5.0, biomagnifying methylmercury over 10 to 20 years to levels (>1.0 ppm) that cause human neurotoxicity.

🧬 Support Open Science
Explore interactive science games on LowKey Games or browse scientific apparel & accessories in the CRV Science Shop.
💡 Spot an inaccuracy or have primary literature to expand this article?
Submit a citation or revision note using your shared CRV Science / LowKey Games profile ID.
Suggest Revision